Across professional landscapes, there are cases of ethical lapses that remain unaddressed, and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia formerly operating under the name Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but calls into question the enterprise’s moral standing.


Even amid the disturbing accusations, Collins has maintained his position , apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to testimonies from colleagues, Collins’ pattern of ethical violations started with disregard for corporate codes of conduct, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left the workforce disheartened and stakeholders unsettled .


Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly exploited the session for unethical personal gains. It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , accessed inappropriate content , a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was David Collins KeriKeri kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches didn’t cease at those affairs . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged misuse of corporate technology to distribute inappropriate content —a gross violation of IT protocols . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these virtual misconduct, Collins allegedly took his actions to a new level: he is said to have had inappropriate relations with a subordinate during work hours , despite the personal and professional conflicts involved. This blatant exploitation of business resources broke all norms of professionalism but also had ramifications beyond just the corporate sphere.

How can this behavior be enabled to persist? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, originates in a problematic dearth of accountability within the company . Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.

This lack of oversight conveys a risky precedent : that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It fosters a toxic corporate culture , creates here a hostile work environment, and ultimately tarnishes the firm’s reputation .